top of page

Is Lendlease Global Commercial REIT A Good Buy in 2026? [Fundamental Analysis]

Writer: Daniel Lee
Daniel Lee
11 hours ago
6 min read

In this article, we'll conduct a fundamental analysis and review of Lendlease Global Commercial REIT and its suitability to achieve the following investment objective: To deliver a stable dividend yield of 5% to 6% per year while having high capital preservation ability.



Business Description

Lendlease Global Commercial REIT is an office and commercial (retail) REIT that was listed in 2019.  


What I Like About Lendlease:

  • The underlying property exposure is concentrated in the Singapore retail scene, which has proved itself to be operationally resilient over time.



What I Do Not Like About Lendlease:

  • N.A.V. per share have been deteriorating since listing. (Figure 3)


  • The previous management has negatively impacted the performance and the health of the company – that said, current management, which recently took control in 2026, is still somewhat unproven.


  • The bulk of the management fees are paid in the form of units, which inflates the reported DPU and clouds the intrinsic value (Figure 7)



Updates From Recent Performance (FY 2025/6)

General Comments:

  • DPU from operations dropped by 1.27% due to the impact of dilution despite top-line growth in revenue and net property income as a result of the contributions of the acquired properties.


  • Implemented significant capital recycling initiatives - divested Jem office, acquired PLQ mall and pared down aggregate leverage (see portfolio movements). Management has signalled its intention to divest its Milan property when the time is right and further increase its Singapore exposure.


  • Total leverage (inclusive of perps) decreased by 6.38%, average cost of debt fell by 0.71% and Interest Cover Ratio (excl Perps) improved to 2.1x from 1.6x.


Positive Headwinds:

  • Limited retail supply in Singapore, coupled with a rebound in tourist arrivals, is expected to support occupancy and rental growth of local properties.


Negative Headwinds:

  • The risk of a strengthening of SGD will further impact Sky Complex’s valuation and performance. In addition, finding a “right time” to divest in an environment where borrowing costs are rising will be challenging.


Portfolio Movements

Acquisition

Item

Detail

Property name

PLQ Mall

Asset type

Suburban retail mall;

Land tenure

 88.0 years remaining at 30 Jun 2026

Purchase price

Agreed property value S$885.0m on a 100% basis (S$2,789 psf of NLA), 2.2% below the S$905.0m average of two valuations

Property cap rate

Valuation cap rate 4.25%, discount rate 7.00% (CBRE, 30 Jun 2026)

Entry NPI yield

4.5% on agreed value, based on forecast calendar 2026 NPI of S$39.5m. Analyst run rate check: FY2026 consolidated NPI of S$10.1m over 97 days annualises to about S$38.0m, or 4.3% on agreed value and 4.2% on all in cost.

Completion dates

70%: 26 Nov 2025. 30%: 26 Mar 2026

Funding

Private placement S$280.0m at S$0.602 and preferential offering S$196.6m at S$0.558 (total S$476.6m, 817.5m units)

 

Manager's rationale vs independent assessment

Manager: a dominant mall anchoring the Paya Lebar precinct, bought below valuation at a competitive 4.5% NPI yield; full ownership allows refinancing (about S$2m a year saved) and active asset management;

 

Independent view on quality: credible. Two line MRT interchange, 88 years of land lease, and a trade area population forecast to reach 857,000 by 2030 (Manager commissioned data, growth of 1.1% a year, in line with Singapore).

 

Independent view on price: market price, not a bargain. FCT paid the same 4.5% NPI yield for Northpoint City South Wing in 2025 [17]. Both long term owners (ADIA with 70% and the Sponsor with 30%) chose to sell at this level. The 2.2% discount to valuation was absorbed by transaction costs: the June 2026 valuation sits only 0.8% above the booked cost

 

Income check: annualised FY2026 NPI of about S$38.0m runs about 4% below the S$39.5m forecast. Part of this is the reconfiguration of about 16,000 sq ft, during which committed occupancy fell from 99.4% to 96.3%. The forecast is not yet proven.

 

Verdict: good asset at a fair price. Positive for portfolio quality and near term renewal upside; negative for capital preservation (NAV dilution); only marginally positive for DPU, and that margin depends on interest rates staying low.


---


Divestments

Item

Detail

Property name

Jem (office component): 12 office floors within the Jem mixed-use development

Asset type

Decentralised office, single tenant: Ministry of National Development on a 30 year lease from 3 Dec 2014 to 2044 [10]. Rent uplift of about 13% from 3 Dec 2024 [2 p.25]

Approximate NLA

About 310,800 sq ft (analyst-derived: FY2025 Jem NLA of 893,092 sq ft less FY2026 retail NLA of 582,258 sq ft). Implied exit price about S$1,486 psf

Remaining underlying land lease

About 83.9 years remaining at completion

Initial purchase date and price

Not bought on its own. Jem was acquired in stages: 5% of ARIF3 in Oct 2020, an effective 31.8% in Sep 2021 at an agreed property value of S$2,077m, and the remaining 68.2% on 22 Apr 2022 at S$2,079m (S$2,349 psf).

 

The office was about 20% of the asset (about S$416m) per the independent market report. The Manager's cost of investment for the office is about S$450.5m (net proceeds S$459.4m less the S$8.9m net cash gain disclosed)

Exit price

S$462.0m, in line with the JLL valuation at 31 Jul 2025. Buyer: Keppel Sustainable Urban Renewal (SUR) strategy, an unrelated party.

Exit cap rate

3.50%, the valuer's office cap rate held unchanged from FY2022 to FY2025. Analyst implied passing NPI yield: about 3.8% (estimated annual NPI of S$16m to S$18m)

Market reference

CBRE prime office net yield 3.7% (Q2 2026)

Colliers CBD Grade A yield 3.62% (Q2 2025)

Total gain or loss since purchase

Net cash gain over cost of about S$8.9m, roughly 2.0% over about 3.6 years (about 0.5% a year). Accounting loss on divestment of S$4.8m from transaction costs.

Total divestment costs about S$5.0m, including a S$2.31m divestment fee to the Manager, paid in units.

Completion date

12 Nov 2025 (option signed 4 Aug 2025) [1 p.24]

Use of proceeds

Net proceeds of about S$459.4m, predominantly to repay bank borrowings

 

Manager's rationale: capital recycling

The trigger was the balance sheet. The Manager states that unitholders said gearing was too high and that it accelerated the sale in response [2 p.11]. At 30 Jun 2025 gearing was 42.6% and ICR 1.6x. This was capital recycling forced by leverage, not by asset quality.

 

Independent Check: the headroom did not last. The REIT agreed to buy PLQ Mall on 5 Nov 2025, a week before the sale completed. Gross borrowings ended FY2026 at S$1,705.3m, S$41.0m higher than a year earlier. The sale proceeds effectively funded a move into a new, higher-yielding but shorter lease asset.

 

Verdict: correctly priced, early relative to the office upswing, and income negative. It converted the most defensive income stream into balance sheet capacity, which was then spent on PLQ Mal



Independent Market Review

Performance vs Benchmark

Market

IMR vacancy

LREIT occupancy

Verdict

Rationale

Jurong East (Jem)

3.3%

100.0%

Marginally outperforming, future at risk

3.3 points ahead of a tight market. Jem is 44% of AUM, faces J'Den and Gateway Hub supply in 2027, and stage 2 of the JRL has no firm date.

Orchard (313@somerset)

7.2%

98.0%

Outperforming

5 points ahead, but occupancy slipped from 98.8% as the market softened. Shortest WALE in the portfolio rolls into Comcentre's 2028 opening.

Paya Lebar (PLQ Mall)

Not covered (suburban 4.9%)

96.3%

In line

Only 1.2 points ahead of the suburban proxy, down from 99.4% in Jan 26 during reconfiguration. Cannot be tested against its own micro market.

Marine Parade (Parkway Parade)

6.3%

98.5%

Outperforming on small base

10% stake, about 2% of assets. Market rents fell 4.2% and a 99,800 sq ft mall opens next door by 2027.

Milan Periphery

12.7%

89.1%

Underperforming

Headline is in line only because Sky Italia fills Buildings 1 and 2 (78% of space). Building 3 is roughly half let (analyst estimate) vs 87% for the market.


---


Supply Risk Map

Market

IMR supply signal

LREIT exposure

Risk for LREIT

Orchard

Comcentre retail 2028 (Sponsor JV, about 200,000 sq ft), NoMad end 2026; negative absorption

25.1%

Moderate to High

Jurong East

J'Den and Gateway Hub 2027; JLD Town Hall Link retail up to 474,000 sq ft later

44.0%

Moderate

Paya Lebar

IMR silent. Tanjong Katong Complex in the 2028+ redevelopment wave.

21.5%

Moderate (unverified)

Marine Parade

Underground mall 99,800 sq ft (6.7% of stock) by 2027

About 2% (outside AUM)

High

Milan Periphery

75,000 sq m to 2029 plus Sponsor's MIND 346,000 sq m by 2032; absorption below supply

9.4%

Elevated

Islandwide

Under construction: 344k (H2 26), 344k (2027), 1,066k (2028), 926k (2029) sq ft

All retail

Wave lands with FY2028 and FY2029 rollover

 

 

Download Full Report On Telegram

and continue reading my independent analyst report which will provide you with a detailed look at the fundamentals of the stock to help you out with your investment decision for Is Lendlease Global Commercial REIT:

*Join the channel → click on the channel name → under files → download the report you want!


If you would like to learn about REIT investing, you can find my entire methodology in my eBook: Retire With REITs here:


Connect with me on social media platforms to receive updates on future content! You can also slide into my DMs if you have any questions :)





Disclaimer:

This article is meant to be the opinion of the author

This article is for information purposes only

This article should not be seen as financial advice

This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore


Comments


bottom of page